Mystery Man

To those parties who are actually making every effort to turn over every stone to secure access to the original, first generation Jimmy Darnell & Dave Wiegman

film in the private vault of NBC, we should praise them for their due diligence. May justice smile upon them. There is a telling reason that the *Prayer Man figure hasn’t been accounted for. There’s also a reason why Mr. Oswald’s airtight alibi was promptly hidden away from public view/consumption for decades. Could a common denominator be in play here folks?

I’ve read that many researchers are lukewarm to the discovery of ace card researcher Sean Murphy’s major breakthrough due to the blurred photos depicting Prayer Man. Here’s an example, courtesy of top shelf JFK researcher Mr. Josephs (David’s) invaluable contributions to the research community.

Yes, admittedly, the picture is blurry and void of distinct features, etc (the male figure in question is on your viewing left–lone figure with his arms coming together, thus ace card researcher Sean Murphy’s reference to praying + man =’s Prayer Man…for a more in depth review/analysis of this major breakthrough discovery —-> Sean Murphy and Prayer Man

To address the legitimate blur concerns, the following picture–a zoom enhancement– of the figure eases the concerns about the figure being Too fuzzy (note eyes and shape of head)…and suffices as there is but only one distinct face emerging amid the ongoing enhancements…


Moving forward, It’s way past time to set the record straight on the actual events of Friday, November 22, 1963.

Here’s another zoom enhancement image of the Prayer Man figure standing outside on the front entrance steps, when President John F. Kennedy’s limousine passes by…again, there’s only one distinct face in that plaza that emerges out of the blur —->

*AF201X (June 12, 2018)

It’s him!

zoom enhancement (*AF201X) of the male figure –is of a man standing on Buell Wesley Frazier’s right in the original non-cropped photo, thus he cannot be a woman named Sarah Stanton, who is on Mr. Frazier’s left  —–>

Believe it or not one researcher is convinced Prayer Man is a woman named Sarah Stanton.

*Lest we forget, Mr. Murphy’s male figure breakthrough discovery is the ONLY individual unidentified in Warren Commission Exhibit 1381There’s a reason this unidentified male wasn’t identified…

more like couldn’t be identified–given the fictional account of the nefarious events on Friday, November 22, 1963. His identity & actual whereabouts that afternoon, when a barrage of gunfire erupted in Dealey Plaza, ran/runs contrary to everything you have been told. The wrongly accused did not shoot anybody —->


In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry…. Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961

To wit, less than a year later —-> Operation Northwoods

12 thoughts on “Mystery Man”

  1. My hubby and I have been to the grassy knoll – it obviously wasn’t Oswald. I think Liam Scheff got it right in his book Official Stories.

    1. Agree wholeheartedly with you regarding the wrongfully accused. He didn’t shoot anybody. Anybody.

      Will have to venture over to Liam’s site to read his take on this five decades old murder mystery.

  2. Hello, I’m trying to find out more about any new credible and useful information that has emerged from last year’s release of the assassination files, as in keeping with the Records Act. –Best, Larry Sparano

    1. Hi Larry,

      The following link should serve you/your curiosity well if you have some free time on your hands —->

      Wish I could be of more help to you with specific details, but I’ve developed a skeptic view of why these records were hidden away from public view/consumption in the first place, so haven’t quite read in depth the files they chose to release, reasoning the “reveal” wouldn’t be anything more than akin to mere Agency jargon anyway @ “limited hang-out“…

      *A limited hangout or partial hangout is, according to former special assistant to the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency Victor Marchetti —-> “spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting—sometimes even volunteering—some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”

      What’s odd about this case is their total reliance upon the “national security” clause to avoid releasing all of the files in their full entirety, yet with a straight face maintain a mere pathetic lone, single gunman was responsible for President Kennedy’s demise. Riight!

      1. Victor Marchetti was instrumental in exposing that a major CIA operative involved in Watergate was also present in Dealey Plaza on the day the president was assassinated. Here’s an excerpt:

        “As Marchetti’s SPOTLIGHT article reported, an in-house CIA memo, ostensibly written in 1966 — some 12 years previously — was leaked to congressional investigators.

        The memo stated Hunt had been in Dallas on the day of the JFK assassination, and that CIA officials were concerned the agency would one day have to explain Hunt’s presence there.

        The SPOTLIGHT subsequently learned CIA Director Richard Helms and the CIA’s chief of counterintelligence, James Angleton, had signed off on the memo.

        Marchetti suggested that because the CIA perceived Hunt to be a villain in the public’s eye as a consequence of Watergate, the CIA had decided to sacrifice Hunt and “admit” he had been involved in the assassination.

        The CIA would claim Hunt was acting on his own and that the CIA, as an institution, had no part in the president’s murder”.

    1. Granted that in the photo you are referencing many researchers have already conceded that Billy Nolan Lovelady is “Doorway Man”. However, the individual who snapped that famous photo, Mr. Altgens (James), was not the only photographer taking pictures that afternoon of that particular location. In fact, the following photo, courtesy of Mr. Weigman (Dave) —->

      *insert image here

      was snapped simultaneously at a different angle while Mr. Altgen’s was taking his series of pictures. Note the male standing behind Billy Lovelady, bringing his hands together while holding something that reflects amid the bright sunlight. Lovelady, in his Warren Commission testimony almost inadvertently revealed this man’s name, but due to a quick redirect by Warren Commission counsel did not name him. However, what he did do was confirm and acknowledge that a live, breathing human flesh someone was standing directly behind him —->

      Mr. BALL – You ate your lunch on the steps?
      Mr. LOVELADY – Yes, sir.
      Mr. BALL – Who was with you?
      Mr. LOVELADY – Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton, and right behind me

      Again, Warren Commission counsel rather abruptly redirected the focus away from the individual behind Lovelady —->

      Mr. LOVELADY – Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton, and right behind me
      Mr. BALL – What was that last name?
      Mr. LOVELADY – Stanton.
      Mr. BALL – What is the first name?
      Mr. LOVELADY – Bill Shelley.
      Mr. BALL – And Stanton’s first name?
      Mr. LOVELADY – Miss Sarah Stanton.

      Now, that we established via another photographer’s angle, and Lovelady’s testimony of his own volition, we still have an individual standing there behind Lovelady unaccounted for.

      To date, fifty plus years later he is the only individual unidentified in Commission Exhibit 1381, where all of the other Texas School Book Depository employees gave sworn statements as to their precise whereabouts when a barrage of gunfire erupted upon the presidential limousine.

      None of them, not a single one placed themselves in that specific position of the only unidentified individual’s location there behind Lovelady. No wonder they hid Mr. Oswald’s actual whereabouts from public view/consumption for all these years.

      The wrongly accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.

    1. How perceptive of you, certainly a reasonable question to pose. However, Prayer Man’s namesake, Mr. Murphy (Sean) answered this question succinctly five years ago, referring others with the same question back to those FBI sworn statements within Commission Exhibit 1381 ( a letter, from the FBI to the Warren Commission, dated April 3, 1964, enclosing statements from all of the Texas School Book Depository employees as of November 22, 1963), where they conclusively shared they did Not see any strangers that day —->

      No one saw a stranger in their midst that afternoon while viewing the presidential parade. Moreover, after careful personal study of just the employees on the same stairs as Prayer Man, I’ve found that all of these thirteen (13) employees had worked in the building for at least a few years, with some of them as many as decades.

      So, the idea that this particular group–having worked in the same building for so many years– wouldn’t know a stranger in their midst–in such close, intimate proximity on the same stairs in the same location, is akin to believing they all needed an eye exam in spite of their 20/20 vision.

      Brief recap: we have determined that Doorway Man is not Prayer Man; and, No one saw any strangers that fateful afternoon during the parade. So, just who is this only unidentified male figure upon those steps? No one else lays claim to that specific position. No one saw any strangers that day…

      Why did they conceal Mr. Oswald’s airtight alibi from public view/consumption for decades?

      What is your Dr. Spock sense of logic telling you?

      Why is the truth being covered up?

      Oh what a tangled web we weave,
      When first we practise to deceive!
      –Sir Walter Scott, 1771-1832, Scottish author & novelist.

  3. The same globalist savages that took the greatest president of at least the 20th and 21st century generation from us are responsible. I am still trying to understand why enough Americans have not seen through the thespians in Washington to rise up and demand that the Constitution be restored..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *